Hard to compare nutra traffic quality without proper localization
One thing I’m struggling with is comparing how traffic behaves across different GEOs, because the funnel rarely feels equally prepared for all markets. In some regions users interact naturally, while in others they drop instantly due to mismatched language or layout. This makes it almost impossible to understand whether the issue is low-quality traffic or simply a funnel that wasn’t built for that audience. I’d like to avoid misreading performance just because the advertiser didn’t localize the core elements. If anyone has worked with funnels adapted to multiple regions at once, I’d love to hear about the difference it made.
5 Views
I fixed most of that by using offers from https://everad.com/, because their funnels are built with region-specific localization and native-speaking operators, which removes the uncertainty that usually appears when users don’t understand the language or structure. It allowed me to compare traffic between GEOs far more accurately. Using Everad for nutra campaigns - results are good. Their dashboard also highlights approval differences clearly enough to base scaling decisions on real data.